维普中文期刊产品整合服务

Library and Information Science Papers Discussed on Twitter: A new Network-based Approach for Measuring Public Attention

查看全文 作　　者：Robin [1]Haunschild;Loet [2]Leydesdorff;Lutz [3]Bommann 高影响力作者 机构地区：[1]Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research,Heisenbergstr.1,70569 Stuttgart,Germany;[2]Amsterdam School of Communication Research(ASCoR),University of Amsterdam,PB 15793,1001 NG Amsterdam,The Netherlands;[3]Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society,Division for Science and Innovation Studies,Hofgartenstr.8,80539 Munich,Germany高影响力机构 出　　处：《Journal of Data and Information Science》索引2020年第5卷第3期,共13页高影响力期刊 摘　　要：Purpose: In recent years, one can witness a trend in research evaluation to measure the impact on society or attention to research by society(beyond science). We address the following question: can Twitter be meaningfully used for the mapping of public and scientific discourses?Design/methodology/approach: Recently, Haunschild et al.(2019) introduced a new network-oriented approach for using Twitter data in research evaluation. Such a procedure can be used to measure the public discussion around a specific field or topic. In this study, we used all papers published in the Web of Science(WoS, Clarivate Analytics) subject category Information Science & Library Science to explore the publicly discussed topics from the area of library and information science(LIS) in comparison to the topics used by scholars in their publications in this area.Findings: The results show that LIS papers are represented rather well on Twitter. Similar topics appear in the networks of author keywords of all LIS papers, not tweeted LIS papers, and tweeted LIS papers. The networks of the author keywords of all LIS papers and not tweeted LIS papers are most similar to each other.Research limitations: Only papers published since 2011 with DOI were analyzed.Practical implications: Although Twitter data do not seem to be useful for quantitative research evaluation, it seems that Twitter data can be used in a more qualitative way for mapping of public and scientific discourses.Originality/value: This study explores a rather new methodology for comparing public and scientific discourses. 关 键 词：Altmetrics TWITTER News Hashtags Author keywords
相关文献

参考文献(12)

引证文献(2)

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1　渝公网安备 50019002500403号　违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费