3篇
您的检索式：作者名="DONG Hefeng"
|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | 根据非线性贝叶斯理论的界面波频散曲线反演显示文摘通过时频分析法从海底环境噪声数据中提取界面波频散曲线,进而采用非线性贝叶斯反演方法估算海底沉积物厚度、剪切波速度、压缩波速度和密度等参数及其不确定性。参数的最大后验概率(MAP)估计值和边缘概率分布分别通过自适应单纯形模拟退火法和Metropolis-Hastings采样法在各参数先验区间内搜索获得,采用贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)从不同参数化模型中选择最优模型。界面波频散曲线反演结果表明:满足实测数据的最优海底模型结构为3层均匀分布剪切波速度剖面结构,海底深度的反演精度在800m以内,比起压缩波速度和密度,剪切波速度的不确定性更小,对界面波频散曲线更敏感。 | 李翠琳 Stan E Dosso Hefeng Dong | 2012 | 声学学报2012，37，3： | 10 |
| 2 | Comparison of marine controlled-source electromagnetic data acquisition systems by a reservoir sensitivity index:analyzing the effect of water depths显示文摘During the past ten years, a marine controlled source electromagnetic(CSEM) method has been developed rapidly as a technology for hydrocarbon exploration. For shallow water environments, two CSEM data acquisition systems: Seabed Logging(SBL) and towed streamer electromagnetics(TSEM) have been developed in recent years. The purpose is to compare the performance of the SBL and TSEM systems at different water depths. Three different methods for the comparison are presented. The first method is a quick one dimensional sensitivity modelling. As a result, the sensitivity of marine CSEM data increases with water depth for the SBL system. Further, the sensitivity decreases with the increasing water depth for the TSEM system. The two other methods use two dimensional synthetic data from a simple 2-D isotropic model. The second method is a reservoir sensitivity index(RSI) method which has been developed to provide a quick comparison of the two systems. The RSI is calculated as the amplitude of the scattered field dividing by data uncertainty. From the calculations, it is found that with the increasing water depth RSI increases for the SBL system, while it decreases for the TSEM system. The third method uses Occam's inversion, and applies an anomaly transverse resistance(ATR) ratio for evaluating the resulting resistivity image. In shallow water environments, the resolution of the CSEM inversion results is good for both the SBL and TSEM systems. In deep water environments, the resolution of the CSEM inversion is better for the SBL system than for the TSEM system. The ATR ratios of the resistivity images show the similar conclusion. The SBL data acquisition system has an advantage in deep water environments. The TSEM system, on the other hand, is preferable for the shallow water environments. | GUO Zhenwei DONG Hefeng LIU Jianxin | 2016 | Acta Oceanologica Sinica2016，35，11： | 9 |
| 3 | Ultrasonic focusing and scanning with multiple waves显示文摘This paper presents a new focusing and scanning method which focuses multiple waves on a target. The key of the method is to control excitation pulses for each element of the transducer array. The excitation pulse on each array element is obtained by time reversing the signal received by the same element, which is generated by an imaginary source at the target. The excitation pulses from all array elements are transmitted and arrive at the target simultaneously, and focusing is achieved. The performance of the two methods is compared in numerical examples, and it is demonstrated that the proposed method achieves a satisfactory focusing and a good signal-to-noise ratio no matter where the target location is. | 张碧星 刘冬冬 师芳芳 Hefeng Dong | 2013 | Chinese Physics B2013，22，1： | 2 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员