维普期刊资源整合服务平台（V6.5）

维普中文期刊产品整合服务

1篇 您的检索式：作者名="David C Howlett"

选中清除导出查看参考文献查看引证文献引用追踪共1页首页上一页第1页下一页末页 /1 跳转

		题名	作者	年代	出处	被引量
	1	Biopsy of parotid masses:Review of current techniques显示文摘Definitive diagnosis of parotid gland masses is required optimal management planning and for prognosis. There is controversy over whether fine needle aspiration cytology(FNAC) or ultrasound guided core biopsy(USCB) should be the standard for obtaining a biopsy. The aim of this review is to assess the current evidence available to assess the benefits of each technique and also to assess the use of intra-operative frozen section(IOFS). Literature searches were performed using pubmed and google scholar. The literature has been reviewed and the evidence is presented. FNAC is an accepted and widely used technique. It has been shown to have variable diagnostic capabilities depending on centres and experience of staff. USCB has a highly consistent diagnostic accuracy and can help with tumour grading and staging. However, the technique is more invasive and there is a question regarding potential for seeding. Furthermore, USCB is less likely to be offered as part of a one-stop clinic. IOFS has no role as a first line diagnostic technique but may be reserved as an adjunct or for lesions not amenable to percutaneous biopsy. On balance, USCB seems to be the method of choice. The current evidence suggests it has superior diagnostic potential and is safe. With time, USCB is likely to supplant FNAC as the biopsy technique of choice, replicating that which has occurred already in other areas of medicine such a breast practice.	Sananda Haldar Joseph D Sinnott Kemal M Tekeli Samuel S Turner David C Howlett	2016	World Journal of Radiology2016，8，5：	1

返回顶部每页显示：

共1页首页上一页第1页下一页末页 /1 跳转

goolge学术搜索-维普

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1　渝公网安备 50019002500403号　违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证新出网证(渝)字10号全国400电话 - 免长途话费