维普中文期刊产品整合服务
5篇 您的检索式:作者名="Dheera"
    题名 作者 年代 出处 被引量
1First-photon imaging显示文摘Ahmed Kirmani Dheera Venkatraman Dongeek Skin et aL 2014Science2014,343,3:1
2The effect on anterior column loading due to different vertebral augmentation techniques显示文摘Dheera Ananthakrishnan Sigurd Berven Vedat Deviren Kevin Cheng Jeffrey C. Lotz Zheng Xu Christian M. Puttlitz 2004Clinical Biomechanics2004,,:1
3Reversible diencephalic dysfunc- tion as presentation of deep cerebral venous thrombosis due to hyper- homocysteinemia and protein S deficiency: Documentation of a case 显示文摘Kankab Maqbool Hassan Dheera J 2013Journal of neurosciences in rural practice2013,4,2:1
4On the Energy Consumption of Pure and Slotted Aloha Based RFID Anti-collision Protocols显示文摘Dheera J K Kwan W C Raad R 2009Computer Communications2009,32,5:1
5Comparison of trans-gastric vs trans-enteric(trans-duodenal or trans-jejunal)endoscopic ultrasound guided gallbladder drainage using lumen apposing metal stents显示文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound guided gallbladder drainage(EUS-GBD)is being increasingly used in practice(either as a bridge to cholecystectomy in high-risk patients or as destination therapy in non-surgical patients).Stents are used to create a conduit between the lumen of the gallbladder(GB)and the intestinal lumen through the gastric or enteric routes.Among the various types of stents used,cautery-enhanced lumen apposing metallic stents(LAMS)may be associated with fewer adverse events(AEs).AIM To compare the clinical success,technical success,and rate of AEs between transgastric(TG)and trans-enteric[transduodenal(TD)/transjejunal(TJ)]approach to GB drainage.Further,we analyzed whether using cautery enhanced stents during EUS-GBD impacts the above parameters.METHODS Study was registered in PROSPERO(CRD42022319019)and comprehensive literature review was conducted.Manuscripts were reviewed for the data collection:Rate of AEs,clinical success,and technical success.Random effects model was utilized for the analysis.RESULTS No statistically significant difference in clinical and technical success between the TD/TJ and TG approaches(P>0.05)were noted.There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of AEs when comparing two-arm studies only.However,when all studies were included in the analysis difference was almost significant favoring the TD/TJ approach.When comparing cautery-enhanced LAMS with non-cautery enhanced LAMS,a statistically significant difference in the rate of AEs was observed when all the studies were included,with the rate being higher in non-cautery enhanced stents(14.0%vs 37.8%;P<0.01).CONCLUSION As per our study results,TD/TJ approach appears to be associated with lower rate of adverse events and comparable efficacy when compared to the TG approach for the EUS-GBD.Additionally,use of cautery-enhanced LAMS for EUS-GBD is associated with a more favorable adverse event profile compared to cold LAMS.Though the approach chosen depends on several patient and physician factors,the above findings could help in deciding the ideal drainage route when both TG and TD/TJ approaches are feasible.Dheera Grover Ifrah Fatima Murali Dharan 2023World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2023,15,9:0
返回顶部 每页显示:
共1页 首页 上一页 第1页 下一页 末页 /1 跳转

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1 渝公网安备 50019002500403号 违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费