2篇
您的检索式：作者名="Jan W Eriksson"
|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Quantitative Imaging of Serotonergic Biosynthesis and Degradation in the Endocrine Pancreas显示文摘 | Eriksson Olof Selvaraju Ram K Johansson Lars Eriksson Jan W Sundin Anders Antoni Gunnar S?rensen Jens Eriksson Barbro Korsgren Olle | 2014 | The Journal of Nuclear Medicine2014，，3： | 1 |
| 2 | Comparison of four non-alcoholic fatty liver disease detection scores in a Caucasian population显示文摘BACKGROUND Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD)is a common disorder,with an estimated prevalence ranging from 20%to 35%in the general population.Several scores based on easily measurable biochemical and clinical parameters,including the fatty liver index(FLI),hepatic steatosis index(HSI),lipid accumulation product(LAP),and NAFLD liver fat score(LFS),have been developed for the detection of NAFLD.However,comparative information regarding the efficacy of these scores for predicting NAFLD in population-based samples comprising normal and high-risk individuals is lacking.AIM To evaluate four NAFLD detection scores in two samples with different NAFLD risks.METHODS NAFLD screening was performed in a population-based sample of 50-year-old individuals in Uppsala,Sweden[n=310;Prospective investigation of obesity,energy and metabolism(POEM)study]and a high-risk population comprising patients with a body mass index>25 kg/m2 and either high plasma triglycerides(≥1.7 mmol/L)or type 2 diabetes(n=310;EFFECT studies).NAFLD was defined as liver fat>5.5%using magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction.FLI,HSI,LAP,and NAFLD LFS were assessed.A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the different scores.RESULTS The prevalence of NAFLD was 23%in POEM.FLI showed the highest receiver operating characteristic area under the curve(ROC AUC;0.82)and was significantly better than the LAP score(P=0.005 vs LAP,P=0.08 vs LFS,P=0.12 vs HSI)for detection of NAFLD.The other three indices performed equally in POEM(0.77-0.78).The prevalence of NAFLD was 74%in EFFECT;LFS performed best(ROC AUC 0.80)in this sample.The ROC AUC for LFS(0.80)was significantly higher than that for FLI(P=0.0019)and LAP(P=0.0022),but not HSI(P=0.11).We performed a sensitivity analysis with stratification for the two high-risk subgroups(patients with diabetes or hypertriglyceridemia)from the EFFECT studies.LAP performed best in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.No major differences were observed between the other scores.CONCLUSION The four investigated NAFLD scores performed differently in the populationbased vs high-risk setting.FLI was preferable in the population-based setting,while LFS performed best in the high-risk setting. | Lars Lind Lars Johansson Hakan Ahlstrom Jan W Eriksson Anders Larsson Ulf Risérus Joel Kullberg Jan Oscarsson | 2020 | World Journal of Hepatology2020，12，4： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员