维普中文期刊产品整合服务
13篇 您的检索式:作者名="Michael Panos"
    题名 作者 年代 出处 被引量
1Nonlinear dynamic analysis of multi-base seismically isolated structures with uplift potentialⅡ:verification examples显示文摘当分析模型的数字确认在同伴纸发展了因为多底的非线性的动态分析地震地孤立结构,在这份报纸介绍的工作服务。到这个目的,二个数字例子用合并到节目 3D-BASIS-ME-MB 的计算算法被分析了,根据最新提出的分析模型发展了。第一个例子使在公牛在大学在地震模拟器上被测试并且也为节目 SAP2000 被用作一个确认例子的七故事的模型结构担心。第二个例子与一个段层式的地震隔离的系统使二塔的、有多层楼的结构担心。为确认的目的, 3D-BASIS-ME-MB 生产的关键结果与从另外的结构 / 有限的元素程序获得的试验性的结果,或结果相比。在两个例子,分析结构在适用的条件下面激动高举,因此产出对验证发达分析工具的能力的许多兴趣的一个盒子。关键词地震隔离 - 非线性的动态分析 - 高举 - 确认 - 多重上层建筑 /Panayiotis C.Roussis Panos C.Tsopelas Michael C.Constantinou 2010Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration2010,9,1:5
2Nonlinear dynamic analysis of multi-base seismically isolated structures with uplift potential Ⅰ:formulation显示文摘现代地震联盟者的复杂性孤立结构在它捕获象隔离乾那样的潜在的不连续的现象的全部和能力要求结构的系统和隔离系统的分析高举并且他们上层建筑和隔离硬件上的效果。在这篇论文,一个分析模型被开发,一个计算算法被提出分析复杂地震联盟者甚至当经历高度非线性的现象例如时,孤立上层建筑高举。计算模型有与强壮的非线性为隔离设备的各种各样的类型建模的能力,分析多重底(多达五个底) 上的多重上层建筑(多达五座分开的上层建筑) ,并且捕获忍受轴的力量上的侧面的负担的效果,包括适用高举。此处开发的模型被利用了形成软件平台 3D-BASIS-ME-MB,它与现代隔离系统为复杂结构的分析和设计向练习工程社区提供一个万用的工具。Panos C.Tsopelas Panayiotis C.Roussis Michael C.Constantinou 2009Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration2009,8,3:2
3Timed Petri Nets in Hybrid Systems: Stability and Supervisory Control显示文摘Xenofon D. Koutsoukos Kevin X. He Michael D. Lemmon Panos J. Antsaklis 1998Discrete Event Dynamic Systems1998,,2:1
4Microcantilever transducers:A new approach in sensor technology 显示文摘Michael Sepaniak Panos Datskos Nickolay Lavrik 2002Analytical Chemistry2002,,1:1
5Displacement Estimates for Performance-Based Seismic Design 显示文摘Andrew Whittaker Michael Constantinou Panos Tsopelas 1998Journal of Structural Engineering1998,124,8:1
6Toggle-bracedamper seismic energy dissipation systems 显示文摘Constantinou Michael C Panos Tsopelas 2001Journal of Structural Engineering2001,127,2:1
7Periodontal Disease and Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: Does the Evidence Support an Independent Association?: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association显示文摘Peter B. Lockhart Ann F. Bolger Panos N. Papapanou Olusegun Osinbowale Maurizio Trevisan Matthew E. Levison Kathryn A. Taubert Jane W. Newburger Heather L. Gornik Michael H. Gewitz Walter R. Wilson Sidney C. Smith Larry M. Baddour 2012Circulation2012,,20:1
8Transactions costs and nonlinear adiustment in real exchange rates: An empirical investigation显示文摘Michael Panos A Robert Nobay David A Peel 1997The Journal of Political Economy1997,105,4:1
9A Simple Method to Derive Bounds on the Size and to Train Multilayer Neural Networks显示文摘Sartori Michael A Antsaklis Panos J 1991IEEE Transaction on Neural Network Industrial Electronics1991,2,4:1
10Optimal partitioning and coordination decisions in decomposition-based design optimization显示文摘James T Michael K Panos Y 2009ASME Journal of Mechanical Design2009,131,8:1
11On selecting single-level formulations for complex system design optimization显示文摘James T Michael K Panos Y 2007ASME Journal of Mechanical Design2007,129,9:1
12Toggle-brace-damper seismic energy dissipation systems 显示文摘MICHAEL C C PANOS T 2001Journal of Structural Engineering2001,127,2:1
13Monitoring gully erosion in the European Union: A novel approach based on the Land Use/Cover Area frame survey (LUCAS)显示文摘The European Commission's Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection(COM(2012)46)identified soil erosion as an important threat to European Union's(EU)soil resources.Gully erosion is an important but hitherto poorly understood component of this threat.Here we present the results of an unprecedented attempt to monitor the occurrence of gully erosion across the EU and UK.We integrate a soil erosion module into the 2018 LUCAS Topsoil Survey,which was conducted to monitor the soil health status across the EU and to support actions to prevent soil degradation.We discuss and explore opportunities to further improve this method.The 2018 LUCAS Topsoil Survey consisted of soil sampling(0-20 cm depth)and erosion observations conducted in ca.10%(n=24,759)of the 238,077 Land Use/Cover Area frame Survey(LUCAS)2018 in-field survey sites.Gully erosion channels were detected for ca.1%(211 sites)of the visited LUCAS Topsoil sites.Commission(false positives,2.5%)and omission errors(false negatives,5.6%)were found to be low and at a level that could not compromise the representativeness of the gully erosion survey.Overall,the findings indicate that the tested 2018 LUCAS Topsoil in-field gully erosion monitoring system is effective for detecting the incidence of gully erosion.The morphogenesis of the mapped gullies suggests that the approach is an effective tool to map permanent gullies,whereas it appears less effective to detect short-lived forms like ephemeral gullies.Spatial patterns emerging from the LUCAS Topsoil field observations provide new insights on typical gully formation sites across the EU and UK.This can help to design further targeted research activities.An extension of this approach to all LUCAS sites of 2022 would significantly enhance our understanding of the geographical distribution of gully erosion processes across the EU.Repeated every three years,LUCAS soil erosion surveys would contribute to assess the state of gully erosion in the EU over time.It will also enable monitoring and eventually predicting the dynamics of gully erosion.Data collected were part of the publicly available Gully Erosion LUCAS visual assessment(GE-LUCAS v1.0)inventory.Pasquale Borrelli Jean Poesen Matthias Vanmaercke Cristiano Ballabio Javier Hervas Michael Maerker Simone Scarpa Panos Panagos 2022International Soil and Water Conservation Research2022,10,1:0
返回顶部 每页显示:
共1页 首页 上一页 第1页 下一页 末页 /1 跳转

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1 渝公网安备 50019002500403号 违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费