2篇
您的检索式：作者名="Mochammad Ma"
|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in uterine fibroid treatment: A meta-analysis显示文摘Objective:Uterine fibroids are the most commonly occurring benign solid tumors in women,and laparoscopic or open myomectomy constitutes the primary option for treatment.However,both methods are under debate currently in terms of efficacy and safety.In this meta-analysis we assessed the efficacy and safety of the two procedures.Methods:We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed,ScienceDirect,and the Cochrane Library in December 2020.The search terms included“open myomectomy”,“myomectomies”,“laparoscopic”,and“uterine fibroids”.We then selected the randomized control trials published from 1996 to 2019 and compared laparoscopic and open myomectomies.Results:We included 10 studies of 449 patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy and 449 patients who underwent open myomectomy.The data revealed that laparoscopic myomectomy was associated with reduced blood loss(MD=-34.43;95%CI,-34.92 to-33.94;p<0.001),an attenuated decline in hemoglobin(MD=-1.04;95%CI,-1.14 to -0.93;p<0.001),less post-operative pain at 24 h(MD=-0.51;95%CI,-0.83 to -0.19;p=0.002),and fewer overall complications(OR=0.42;95%CI,0.24 to 0.71;p=0.001)relative to open myomectomy;but the former possessed a longer operative time(MD=12.96;95%CI,9.94 to 15.97;p<0.001).There were no significant differences in pregnancy rate(OR=1.39;95%CI,0.72 to 2.68;p=0.33)or recurrence rate of postoperative uterine fibroids(OR=1.15;95%CI,0.60 to 2.18;p=0.67)between the two groups.Conclusion:Laparoscopic myomectomy displayed superior results compared to open myomectomy,although the former involved a longer operating time. | Probo Yudha Pratama Putra Arlinda Silva Prameswari Mochammad Ma'roef Aida Musyarrofah Halida Nelasari | 2021 | Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery2021，4，3： | 1 |
| 2 | Effectivity and efficacy probiotics for Bacterial Vaginosis treatments:Meta-analysis显示文摘Introduction:Bacterial Vaginosis(BV)is the most common cause of vaginal discharge.However,in some cases,side effects and resistance rates have been reported when anti-biotics are administered.This problem has prompted several investigations on the administration of probiotics as an adjunct therapy to treat this infection.Objection:This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis based on evidence to determine the efficacy and safety of probiotic and antibiotic treatments.Methods:The meta-analysis was performed using PRISMA guidelines.The literature review was conducted in December 2020 using PubMed,Science Direct,Cochrane Library,and RevMan V.5.3.Result:The results showed a high and significant cure rate from the analysis of 1006 and 528 samples of probiotics and non-probiotics or control in 16 studies.The recurrence rate was statistically significant with probiotic treatment.Furthermore,neither procedures nor therapy failure showed a significantly lower adverse event rate than the control group.Conclusion:Probiotic shows better results compared to the control group.However,both have the same occurrence of adverse event. | Sri Adila Nurainiwati Mochammad Ma'roef Dwi Nurwulan Pravitasari Probo Yudha Pratama Putra | 2022 | Infectious Disease Modelling2022，7，4： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员