|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | What Is Culture?——A Grounding Question for Cognitive Semiotics显示文摘This article first outlines the principle of a cognitive semiotics,and in this framework presents a sign classification taking into consideration the crucial importance of time.It then offers a stratified interpretation of the Lotmanian concept of semiosphere,and continues with a study of the contradiction holding between cultural and socio-functional meanings.This leads to an analysis of ethnic passions and ethnic identity,and finally to a new analysis of homo metonymicus,and the two underlying cognitive structures based on the genitive and the dative schemas,that orient the human imaginary,for better or for worse. | Per Aage Brandt | 2015 | Language and Semiotic Studies2015，1，2： | 1 |
| 2 | The burden of untreated ADHD among adults : the role of stimulant medication 显示文摘 | Per Kristian Goksoyr Jim Aage Nattestad | 2008 | Addict Behav2008，33，2： | 1 |
| 3 | Making sense of a blend a cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor 显示文摘 | BRANDT LINE AND BRANDT PER AAGE | 2005 | Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics2005，，3： | 1 |
| 4 | Mental spaces and cognitive semantics : a critical comment 显示文摘 | BRANDT PER AAGE | 2005 | Journal of Pragmatics2005，，37： | 1 |
| 5 | Homocysteine Lowering and Cardiovascular Events after Acute Myocardial Infarction显示文摘 | Kaare Harald Bonaa Inger Njolstad Per Magne Ueland Henrik Schirmer Aage Tverdal Terje Steigen | | 0，，15： | 1 |
| 6 | Editorial Preface 显示文摘 | Brandt Per Aage & Jakob Simonsen | 2007 | Cognitive Semiotics2007，，2： | 1 |
| 7 | Interleukin-6 concentrations in neonates evaluated for sepsis显示文摘 | Henrik Doellner Knut J. Arntzen Per E. Haereid Solrun Aag Rigmor Austgulen | 1998 | The Journal of Pediatrics1998，，2： | 1 |
| 8 | What Is a Game?--A Ludo-Semiotic Approach显示文摘In this diminutive essay, I propose a schema that may specify the behavior we associate with playing games, and I emphasize in particular the function of the factor of chance. I also suggest a blending model accounting for the important intentional properties of participating and watching games—the dynamic phenomenology of ludic semiosis. | Per Aage Brandt | 2018 | Language and Semiotic Studies2018，4，4： | 0 |
| 9 | Saussure’s Prolegomena——Toward a Semiotics of the Mind显示文摘The study of language is based either on the word or on the sentence as basic units.Ferdinand de Saussure opted for the word;other linguists later preferred the sentence or chose to ignore the difference between word and sentence.Words,however,have extra-linguistic functions related to the topologies of thought,the spontaneous geometrical imageries of meaningful mental figuration,as we know them from sign posts,from verbal descriptions,and from the semiotics of diagrams.If words,rather than sentences,are in this sense the essential connectors of language and thought,then the general architecture of linguistic structures,including semantics and syntax,should be centered around this lexical“window”into the thinking mind,and the semiotic modes of language and signs may then be described by similar architectures directly connected to the figurative mind itself.This paper offers tentative connected models of the architectures of language,signs,and the figurative mind,and suggests the possibility of interpreting Ferdinand de Saussure’s semiological intuitions in the sense of a semiotics of the mind along these cognitive-semiotic lines. | Per Aage Brandt | 2022 | Language and Semiotic Studies2022，8，1： | 0 |
| 10 | Linguistic Theory in the Framework of a Cognitive Semiotics: Language as Simulation and Linearization of Thought显示文摘A cognitive version of semiotics has to reopen the discussion of how to understand language in general and the possibility of a theory of language. L. Hjelmslev and his current French semio-linguistic followers, inspired by the great pioneer of structural semantics A.-J. Greimas, anchor their inquiry exclusively in text and discourse. By contrast, cognitive linguistics from Langacker and Talmy to Croft and Evans anchors language in the embodied mind, but has no perspective on text and discourse other than claiming that culture in general shapes what is not shaped by mind and perception. In one frame(Hjelmslev-Greimas), language is everything, and in the other(Langacker-Croft), it is almost nothing(in itself). Could we instead conceive language as ‘something', as forming a substantial, structured, particular link between culture and the mind-brain, essential to both culture and mind-brain? Could we build a theoretical and analytical study of language in all forms, in order to describe it as a structured architecture of instances that connect culture and mind? In that case, we will have to revisit the models of both semio-linguistics and cognitive linguistics and examine the semiotic functions in language that allow the sharing of meaning to which other animals have no access, the sophisticated connection of communication and thinking that makes human culture possible. This paper shortly presents a few core suggestions concerning three involved issues: the linear wording of language(linearization); the role of syntax as a reconstruction of thought that simulates its composition; and the complex semiotic functions that connect its ‘immanent' core operations and its ‘transcendent' enunciational and pragmatic operations. | Per Aage Brandt | 2015 | Language and Semiotic Studies2015，1，1： | 0 |
| 11 | The Meaning and Madness of Money: A Semio-Ecological Analysis显示文摘In this paper, I propose an overall model of the semantic and semiotic functions of money and capital forms, based on an ecological view of human activity and a theory of the origin of money(coined precious metals). The meaning of money is replaced in a structured human perspective, and a critical discussion is outlined on the grounds of the material and capital flows and functions identified. The madness of money follows from the separation of economy and ecology. That madness causes serious damage, especially under certain circumstances that the structural analysis can identify. Finally I add some new considerations on the psycho-semiotic implications of the analysis. The societal structure discussed can be interpreted in terms that have strikingly direct correspondence to those describing semiotic aspects of language and the human psyché, where the concepts of meaning and madness are immediately pertinent. | Per Aage Brandt | 2017 | Language and Semiotic Studies2017，3，3： | 0 |
| 12 | Deixis-a Semiotic Mystery: Enunciation and Reference显示文摘This note aims at clarifying the relation holding or not holding between deixis and indexicality, and then elaborating a new model based on the Danish semiotic enunciation theory that could also account for reference. The ‘mystery' in question is the mysterious fact that the intersubjective aspect of deixis has to constitute the referential anchoring of signified meaning in the extra-communicational world. The model proposed may lay the ground for a new understanding of signs as such. | Per Aage Brandt | 2016 | Language and Semiotic Studies2016，2，4： | 0 |
| 13 | The World,Seen From Within-Three Essays on Metaphysics and Meaning显示文摘These short essays reflect an exploration of a question that has intrigued me for quite some time,namely why—in modern and contemporary thinking and research—the reference to the founders of modern rationality,especially Descartes,Spinoza,and Leibniz,is still so uncertain,timid,vague,even in scholarly contexts,and why the issue of ontological monism versus dualism keeps coming up in everyday debate involving matter,mind,consciousness,and meaning.Are we at all some sorts of rationalists today,in our quest for knowledge in general and for a general view of how reality works?I do not see any viable alternative to rationalistic views,and therefore find it urgent to better understand what such rationalism(s)may mean and have meant. | Per Aage Brandt | 2016 | Language and Semiotic Studies2016，2，1： | 0 |
| 14 | The World,Seen From Within(Ⅰ)On the Enminded Body:Spinoza,Descartes,and the Philosophy of Cognition显示文摘Ontologically, Baruch Spinoza and René Descartes take significantly different stands on truth, mind and meaning. In this respect, the latter can be regarded as the founder of modern epistemology, phenomenology, and scientific thinking. Nevertheless, Spinoza's mysticism and certain resounding Spinozist rejections of Cartesian rationalism can be found at the root of modern analytic philosophy and, even more surprisingly, in most basic assumptions of current cognitive science. The main issue of this 'metaphysical' debate is the status of mind, consciousness, mental representations, truth, and meaning in general, and therefore the debate concerns the possibility of a cognitive semantics. | Per Aage Brandt | 2016 | Language and Semiotic Studies2016，2，1： | 0 |
| 15 | The World,Seen From Within(Ⅱ)Sorts of Reality--A Semio-Cognitive Ontology and Phenomenology显示文摘This short essay discusses the conditions—and the general contours—of a viable ontology assigning a place to meaning in the architecture of the sorts of reality we acknowledge in the framework of a non-reductive realist philosophy(John Searle^1, Barry Smith^2) compatible with both cognitive and semiotic approaches to the human world. | Per Aage Brandt | 2016 | Language and Semiotic Studies2016，2，1： | 0 |
| 16 | The World,Seen From Within(Ⅲ)On Mind and Matter,and the Founders of Rationalism显示文摘The aim of the following essay is to find a semantic core pattern, characterizing its ontology or metaphysics, in the form of thinking that emerged in the work of Descartes, spread and was modified through Spinoza and Leibniz, and became the panorama of science-oriented philosophies constituting the implicit or explicit underpinnings of contemporary thinking, research, and debate, especially in relation to the study of meaning and mind. | Per Aage Brandt | 2016 | Language and Semiotic Studies2016，2，1： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员