维普期刊资源整合服务平台（V6.5）

维普中文期刊产品整合服务

1篇 您的检索式：作者名="Robbie Meek"

选中清除导出查看参考文献查看引证文献引用追踪共1页首页上一页第1页下一页末页 /1 跳转

		题名	作者	年代	出处	被引量
	1	Comparison of five video-assisted intubation devices by novice and expert laryngoscopists for use in the aeromedical evacuation environment显示文摘Background: The critically ill or injured patient undergoing military medical evacuation may require emergent intubation. Intubation may be life-saving, but it carries risks.The novice or infrequent laryngoscopist has a distinct disadvantage because experience is critical for the rapid and safe establishment of a secured airway. This challenge is compounded by the austere environment of the back of an aircraft under blackout conditions. This study determined which of five different video-assisted intubation devices(VAIDs) was best suited for in-flight use by U.S. Air Force Critical Care Air Transport Teams by comparing time to successful intubation between novice and expert laryngoscopists under three conditions, Normal Airway Lights on(NAL), Difficult Airway Lights on(DAL) and Difficult Airway Blackout(DAB), using manikins on a standard military transport stanchion and the floor with a minimal amount of setup time and extraneous light emission.Methods: A convenience sample size of 40 participants(24 novices and 16 experts) attempted intubation with each of the 5 different video laryngoscopic devices on high-fidelity airway manikins. Time to tracheal intubation and number of optimization maneuvers used were recorded. Kruskal-Wallis testing determined significant differences between the VAIDs in time to intubation for each particular scenario. Devices with significant differences underwent pair-wise comparison testing using rank-sum analysis to further clarify the difference. Device assembly times, startup times and the amount of light emitted were recorded. Perceived ease of use was surveyed. Results: Novices were fastest with the Pentax AWS in all difficult airway scenarios. Experts recorded the shortest median times consistently using 3 of the 5 devices. The AWS was superior overall in 4 of the 6 scenarios tested. Experts and novices subjectively judged the Glide Scope Ranger as easiest to use. The light emitted by all the devices was less than the USAF-issued headlamp.Conclusion: Novices intubated fastest with the Pentax AWS in all difficult airway scenarios. The Glide Scope required the shortest setup time, and participants judged this device as the easiest to use. The Glide Scope and AWS exhibited the two fastest total setup times. Both devices are suitable for in-flight use by infrequent and seasoned laryngoscopists. Trial registration: not applicable.	Matthew C.Wallace SSgt Tyler Britton Robbie Meek Sharon Walsh-Hart Col Todd E.Carter Steven J.Lisco	2017	Military Medical Research2017，4，2：	0

返回顶部每页显示：

共1页首页上一页第1页下一页末页 /1 跳转

goolge学术搜索-维普

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1　渝公网安备 50019002500403号　违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证新出网证(渝)字10号全国400电话 - 免长途话费