维普中文期刊产品整合服务
8篇 您的检索式:作者名="Sathiyakumar V"
    题名 作者 年代 出处 被引量
1新型低密度脂蛋白胆固醇评估对全球血脂异常指南中次级靶标非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和载脂蛋白B应用的影响显示文摘血脂异常指南通常推荐非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol,non-HDL-C)和载脂蛋白B(apolipoprotein B,apoB)作为主要靶点低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(low density lipoprotein cholesterol,LDL-C)的次要靶点。Sathiyakumar V Park J Quispe R Elshazly MB Michos ED Banach M Toth PP Whelton SP Blumenthal RS Jones SR Martin SS 刘青 叶鹏 2018中华高血压杂志2018,26,4:4
2Impact of type of surgery on deep venous thrombi and pulmonary emboli : a look at twenty seven thousand hip fracture patients 显示文摘Sathiyakumar V Greenberg SE Jahangir AA 2015Int Orthop2015,39,10:1
3Occupationalinjur among orthopaedic surgeons显示文摘Davis W T Sathiyakumar V Jahangir A A J Bone JointSurg A m0,95,15:1
4An assessment of the inter-rater reliability of the ASA physical status score in the orthopaedic trauma population显示文摘Ihejirika RC Thakore RV Sathiyakumar V 2015Injury2015,46,4:1
5Occupationalinjuramong orthopaedic surgeons显示文摘Davis W T Sathiyakumar V Jahangir A A J Bone JointSurg A m0,95,15:1
6The Effects of A-merican Society of Anesthesiologists physical status on length of stay and inpatient cost in the surgical treatment of isolated orthopaedic fractures显示文摘Kay HF Sathiyakumar V Yoneda ZT 2014J Orthop Trauma2014,28,7:1
7空腹和非空腹测低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的准确性比较显示文摘近期研究表明,非空腹测血脂可能影响低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(10w—density lipoprotein—cholesterol,LDL-C)的评估。LDDC新的评估方法(the novelmethod of LDL—Cestimation,LDL—CN)使用一个较灵活的方法来导出患者特异的三酰甘油与极低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(verylow—density lipoprotein—cholesterol,VLDL)的比值。Sathiyakumar V Park J Golozar A Lazo M Quispe R Guallar E Blumenthal RS Jones SR Martin SS 黄洁 叶鹏 2017中华高血压杂志2017,25,11:0
8Isolated sacral injuries: Postoperative length of stay, complications, and readmission显示文摘AIM: To investigate inpatient length of stay(LOS), complication rates, and readmission rates for sacral fracture patients based on operative approach.METHODS: All patients who presented to a large tertiary care center with isolated sacral fractures in an 11-year period were included in a retrospective chart review. Operative approach(open reduction internal fixation vs percutaneous) was noted, as well as age, gender, race, and American Society of Anesthesiologists' score. Complications included infection, nonunion and malunion, deep venous thrombosis, and hardware problems; 90-d readmissions were broken down into infection, surgical revision of the sacral fracture, and medical complications. LOS was collected for the initial admission and readmission visits if applicable. Fisher's exact and non-parametric t-tests(Mann-Whitney U tests) were employed to compare LOS, complications, and readmissions between open and percutaneous approaches.RESULTS: Ninety-four patients with isolated sacral fractures were identified: 31(30.4%) who underwentopen reduction and internal fixation(ORIF) vs 63(67.0%) who underwent percutaneous fixation. There was a significant difference in LOS based on operative approach: 9.1 d for ORIF patients vs 6.1 d for percutaneous patients(P = 0.043), amounting to a difference in cost of $13590. Ten patients in the study developed complications, with no significant difference in complication rates or reasons for complications between the two groups(19.4% for ORIF patients vs 6.3% for percutaneous patients). Eight patients were readmitted, with no significant difference in readmission rates or reasons for readmission between the two groups(9.5% percutaneous vs 6.5% ORIF).CONCLUSION: There is a significant difference in LOS based on operative approach for sacral fracture patients. Given similar complications and readmission rates, we recommend a percutaneous approach.Vasanth Sathiyakumar Hanyuan Shi Rachel V Thakore Young M Lee David Joyce Jesse Ehrenfeld William T Obremskey Manish K Sethi 2015World Journal of Orthopedics2015,6,8:0
返回顶部 每页显示:
共1页 首页 上一页 第1页 下一页 末页 /1 跳转

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1 渝公网安备 50019002500403号 违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费