维普中文期刊产品整合服务
7篇 您的检索式:作者名="Danny Sleeman"
    题名 作者 年代 出处 被引量
1在诊断 choledochal 包囊的磁性的回声 cholangiopancreatography 的角色: 盒子系列和评论显示文摘 AIM:To determine the merits of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP) as the primary diagnostic test for choledochal cysts(CC’s).METHODS:Between 2009 and 2012,patients who underwent MRCP for perioperative diagnosis were identified.Demographic information,clinical characteristics,and radiographic findings were recorded.MRCP results were compared with intraoperative findings.A PubMed search identified studies published between 1996-2012,employing MRCP as the primary preoperative imaging and comparing results with either endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) or operative findings.Detection rates for CC’s and abnormal pancreaticobiliary junction(APBJ) were calculated.In addition detection rates for clinically related biliary pathology like choledocholithiasis and cholangiocarcinomas in patients diagnosed with CC’s were also evaluated.RESULTS:Eight patients were identified with CC’s.Six patients out of them had typeⅣCC’s,1 had type I and 1 had a new variant of choledochal cyst with confluent dilatation of the common bile duct(CBD) and cystic duct.Seven patients had an APBJ and 3 of those had a long common-channel.Gallstones were found in 2 patients,1 had a CBD stone,and 1 pancreatic-duct stone was also detected.In all cases,MRCP successfully identified the type of CC’s,as well as APBJ with ductal stones.From analyzing the literature,we found that MRCP has 96%-100% detection rate for CC’s.Additionally,we found that the range for sensitivity,specificity,and diagnostic accuracy was 53%-100%,90%-100% and 56%-100% in diagnosing APBJ.MRCP’s detection rate was 100% for choledocholithiasis and 87% for cholangiocarcinomas with concurrent CC’s.CONCLUSION:After initial ultrasound and computed tomography scan,MRCP should be the next diagnostic test in both adult and pediatric patients.ERCP should be reserved for patients where therapeutic intervention is needed.Vikas Y Sacher James S Davis Danny Sleeman Javier Casillas 2013World Journal of Radiology2013,5,8:15
2EUS visualization and direct celiac ganglia neurolysis predicts better pain relief in patients with pancreatic malignancy (with video)显示文摘Gil Ascunce Afonso Ribeiro Isildinha Reis Caio Rocha-Lima Danny Sleeman Jaime Merchan Joe Levi 2011Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2011,,2:2
3Biliary-colonic fistula caused by cholecystectomy bile duct injury显示文摘Biliary-colonic fistula is a rare complication after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We present a case of post-cholecystectomy iatrogenic biliary injury that resulted in a fistula between the common hepatic duct and large bowel. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography provided good visualization of injury even with concurrent normal level of alkaline phosphatase. Radiologic findings and surgical management of this condition are discussed in detail.Francisco Igor B Macedo Victor J Casillas James S Davis Joe U Levi Danny Sleeman 2013Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International2013,12,4:2
4Minimally invasive spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: Does splenic vessel preservation have better postoperative outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis显示文摘BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy(SPDP) can be performed with either splenic vessel preservation(SVP) or resection [Warshaw procedure(WP)]. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative clinical outcomes of patients undergoing both methods.DATA SOURCES: Database search of PubM ed, Embase, Scopus,Cochrane, and Google Scholar was performed(2000-2014); key bibliographies were reviewed. Qualified studies comparing patients undergoing SPDP with either SVP or WP, and assessing postoperative complications were included. Calculated pooled risk ratio(RR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval(CI) by random effects methods were used in the meta-analyses. RESULTS: The search yielded 215 studies, of which only 14 observational studies met our selection criteria. The studies included 943 patients in total; 652(69%) underwent SVP and 291(31%) underwent WP. Overall, there was a lower incidence of splenic infarction(RR=0.17; 95% CI: 0.09-0.33; P<0.001),gastric varices(RR=0.16; 95% CI: 0.05-0.51; P=0.002), and intra/postoperative splenectomy(RR=0.20; 95% CI: 0.08-0.49; P<0.001) in the SVP group. There was no difference in incidence of pancreatic fistula(WP vs SVP, 23.6% vs 22.9%;P=0.37), length of hospital stay, operative time or blood loss. There was moderate cross-study heterogeneity.CONCLUSIONS: SVP is a safe, efficient and feasible technique that may be used to preserve the spleen. WP may be more suitable for large tumors close to the splenic hilum or those associated with splenomegaly. Randomized clinical trials are justified to examine the long-term benefits of SVP-SPDP.Fady Elabbasy Rahul Gadde Mena M Hanna Danny Sleeman Alan Livingstone Danny Yakoub 2015Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International2015,14,4:2
5Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography Accurately Detects Common Bile Duct Stones in Resolving Gallstone Pancreatitis显示文摘Ali H. Hallal Jose D. Amortegui Igor M. Jeroukhimov Javier Casillas Carl I. Schulman Ronald J. Manning Fahim A. Habib Peter P. Lopez Stephen M. Cohn Danny Sleeman 2005Journal of the American College of Surgeons2005,,6:1
6Retroperitoneal and Truncal Sarcomas: Prognosis Depends Upon Type Not Location显示文摘Eduardo A. Perez MD Juan C. Gutierrez MD Frederick L. Moffat MD Dido Franceschi MD Alan S. Livingstone MD Seth A. Spector MD Joe U. Levi MD Danny Sleeman MD Leonidas G. Koniaris MD 2007Annals of Surgical Oncology2007,,3:1
7Radical Resection of Periampullary Tumors in the Elderly: Evaluation of Long-term Results显示文摘Oliver F. Bathe David Levi Humberto Caldera Dido Franceschi Luis Raez Ajay Patel William A. Raub Jr. Pasquale Benedetto Rajender Reddy Duane Hutson Danny Sleeman Alan S. Livingstone Joe U. Levi 2000World Journal of Surgery2000,,3:1
返回顶部 每页显示:
共1页 首页 上一页 第1页 下一页 末页 /1 跳转

网站首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 产品服务 | 客服中心 | 广告服务 | 版权声明 | 网站联盟 | 友情链接 | 售卡网点

版权所有© 渝B2-20050021-1 渝公网安备 50019002500403号 违法和不良信息举报中心

互联网出版许可证 新出网证(渝)字10号 全国400电话 - 免长途话费