|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Outcomes of Sphincter of Oddi Manometry When Performed in Low Volumes显示文摘 | John P. Rice Bret J. Spier Deepak V. Gopal Anurag Soni Mark Reichelderfer Patrick R. Pfau Tony C. K. Tham | 2011 | Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy2011，，： | 1 |
| 2 | Human electrogastrograms显示文摘 | Dr. John W. Hamilton MD Bader E. Bellahsene MS Mark Reichelderfer MD John G. Webster PhD Paul Bass PhD | 1986 | Digestive Diseases and Sciences1986，，1： | 1 |
| 3 | Placement of Gastrostomy Tubes in Patients with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts Does Not Result in Increased Incidence of Shunt Infection or Decreased Survival显示文摘 | Brent E. Roeder Adnan Said Mark Reichelderfer Deepak V. Gopal | 2007 | Digestive Diseases and Sciences2007，，2： | 1 |
| 4 | Gastric electrical stimulation is an effective and safe treatment for medically refractory gastroparesis显示文摘 | Daniel McKenna Gretchen Beverstein Mark Reichelderfer Eric Gaumnitz Jon Gould | 2008 | Surgery2008，，4： | 1 |
| 5 | Variation in Colonoscopic Technique and Adenoma Detection Rates at an Academic Gastroenterology Unit显示文摘 | Mark E. Benson Mark Reichelderfer Adnan Said Eric A. Gaumnitz Patrick R. Pfau | 2010 | Digestive Diseases and Sciences2010，，1： | 1 |
| 6 | Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history显示文摘 | Perry J Pickhardt David H Kim B Dustin Pooler J Louis Hinshaw Duncan Barlow Don Jensen Mark Reichelderfer Brooks D Cash | 2013 | Lancet Oncology2013，，8： | 1 |
| 7 | Prospective Blinded Comparison of Polyp Size on Computed Tomography Colonography and Endoscopic Colonoscopy显示文摘 | Courtney Barancin Perry J. Pickhardt David H. Kim Bret Spier Mary Lindstrom Mark Reichelderfer Deepak Gopal Patrick Pfau | 2011 | Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology2011，，5： | 1 |
| 8 | PET/CT Imaging of Inflammatory Bowel Disease显示文摘 | Scott B. Perlman Benjamin S. Hall Mark Reichelderfer | 2013 | Seminars in Nuclear Medicine2013，，： | 1 |
| 9 | Variation in Colonoscopic Technique and Adenoma Detection Rates at an Academic Gastroenterology Unit显示文摘 | Mark E. Benson Mark Reichelderfer Adnan Said Eric A. Gaumnitz Patrick R. Pfau | 2010 | Digestive Diseases and Sciences2010，，1： | 1 |
| 10 | Outcomes of colon self-expandable metal stents for malignant vs benign indications at a tertiary care center and review of literature显示文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic placement of a self-expandable metal stent(SEMS)is a minimally invasive treatment for use in malignant and benign colonic obstruction.However,their widespread use is still limited with a nationwide analysis showing only 5.4%of patients with colon obstruction undergoing stent placement.This underutilization could be due to perceived increase risk of complications with stent placement.AIM To review long-and short-term clinical success of SEMS use for colonic obstruction at our center.METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all the patients who underwent colonic SEMS placement over aeighteen year period (August 2004 through August 2022) at our academic center. Demographicsincluding age, gender, indication (malignant and benign), technical success, clinical success,complications (perforation, stent migration), mortality, and outcomes were recorded.RESULTSSixty three patients underwent colon SEMS over an 18-year period. Fifty-five cases were formalignant indications, 8 were for benign conditions. The benign strictures included diverticulardisease stricturing (n = 4), fistula closure (n = 2), extrinsic fibroid compression (n = 1), and ischemicstricture (n = 1). Forty-three of the malignant cases were due to intrinsic obstruction from primaryor recurrent colon cancer;12 were from extrinsic compression. Fifty-four strictures occurred on theleft side, 3 occurred on the right and the rest in transverse colon. The total malignant case (n = 55)procedural success rate was 95% vs 100% for benign cases (P = 1.0, NS). Overall complication ratewas significantly higher for benign group: Four complications were observed in the malignantgroup (stent migration, restenosis) vs 2 of 8 (25%) for benign obstruction (1-perforation, 1-stentmigration) (P = 0.02). When stratifying complications of perforation and stent migration there wasno significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.14, NS).CONCLUSIONColon SEMS remains a worthwhile option for colonic obstruction related to malignancy and has ahigh procedural and clinical success rate. Benign indications for SEMS placement appear to havesimilar success to malignant. While there appears to be a higher overall complication rate inbenign cases, our study is limited by sample size. When evaluating for perforation alone theredoes not appear to be any significant difference between the two groups. SEMS placement may bea practical option for indications other that malignant obstruction. Interventional endoscopistsshould be aware and discuss the risk for complications in setting of benign conditions. Indicationsin these cases should be discussed in a multi-disciplinary fashion with colorectal surgery. | Saqib Walayat Andrew J Johannes Mark Benson Eric Nelsen Ahmed Akhter Gregory Kennedy Anurag Soni Mark Reichelderfer Patrick Pfau Deepak Gopal | 2023 | World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2023，15，4： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员