|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | HER2 status in gastroesophageal cancer: a tissue microarray study of 1040 cases显示文摘 | Rocco Cappellesso Matteo Fassan Esther Hanspeter Jan Bornschein Emanuele S.G. d’Amore Lucia V. Cuorvo Guido Mazzoleni Mattia Barbareschi Marco Pizzi Vincenza Guzzardo Peter Malfertheiner Marjan Micev Maria Guido Luciano Giacomelli Vladislav V. Tsukanov Vi | 2015 | Human Pathology2015，，5： | 1 |
| 2 | Labat法坐骨神经阻滞下局部麻醉药低容量高浓度较高容量低浓度更有效:一项前瞻性随机对照研究显示文摘背景有很多因素可以明显影响外周神经阻滞的起效时间和成功率,本项前瞻、随机、双盲研究比较了Labat后路法行坐骨神经阻滞时,单剂量的甲哌卡因300mg分别稀释至20和30ml注射后的阻滞效果差异。方法90例行足部手术的患者,随机分为2组接受坐骨神经阻滞,一组给予1.5%甲哌卡因20m1(45例),另一组给予1%甲哌卡因30m1(45例),所有阻滞均在神经刺激仪定位下进行(参数为刺激频率2Hz;刺激电流为1.5~0.5mA)。两组中,神经刺激反应在〈0.5mA时引出,亦可以定向诱发足部肌肉向跖侧屈曲,分别记录胫神经和腓总神经的运动感觉功能被阻滞的起效时间。而坐骨神经支配区域的针刺感觉消失,同时足部跖曲及背曲运动消失为阻滞成功的标准。结果用20ml的1.5%甲哌卡因组阻滞成功率(96.6%)显著高于30ml的1%甲哌卡因组(68.9%,P〈0.05)。而前者达到感觉与运动完全阻滞所需要的时间(11±6分钟,13±7分钟)也短于后者(17±8分钟,19±8分钟,P〈0.05)。结论Labat法行坐骨神经阻滞时,与高容量低浓度的局部麻醉药(1%甲哌卡因)比较,使用低容量高浓度的局部麻醉药(1.5%甲哌卡因)能够获得更高的阻滞成功率及更短的起效时间。 | Manuel Taboada Muniz, MD, PhD Jaime Rodriguez, MD, PhD Maria Bermudez, MD Cristina Valino, MD Noemi Blanco, MD Marcos Amor, MD Pilar, Aguirre, MD Ana Masid, MD Joaquin Cortes, MD, Ph Julian Alvarez, MD, PhD Peter G. Atanassoff, MD 杨光(译) 崔苏扬(校) | 2010 | 麻醉与镇痛2010，，2： | 1 |
| 3 | Tolerability and efficacy of carvedilol in patients with New York Heart Association class IV heart failure显示文摘 | Peter S Macdonald Anne M Keogh Christina L Aboyoun Mayanna Lund Raul Amor Dermot J McCaffrey | 1999 | Journal of the American College of Cardiology1999，，： | 1 |
| 4 | Inverse modeling in estimating soil hydraulic functions:a Genetic Algorithm approach显示文摘 | Amor V M Ines Peter Droogers | 2002 | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences2002，6，1： | 1 |
| 5 | Concept development and testing of the UK’s first hydrogenhybrid train(HydroFLEX)显示文摘In October 2018,Porterbrook and the University of Birmingham announced the HydroFLEX project,to demonstrate a hydrogen-hybrid modified train atRail Live 2019.The concept of modifying a Class 319 Electric Multiple Unit was developed,with equipment including a fuel cell stack,traction battery,24 V control system and hydrogen storage elements to be mounted inside one of the carriages.This was followed by procurement of a fuel cell stack,traction batteries,and control equipment,which was then installed inside the train,being fixed to the seat rails.One substantial change from the concept was the provision of considerably more hydrogen storage than the minimum necessary,providing the train with more potential to be further modified to allow for higher speed mainline testing.After the Rail Live exhibition where HydroFLEX was demonstrated,numerous modifications were performed to increase the reliability and power of the HydroFLEX train,primarily concerned with modifying the base train logic,with the aim of a successfulmainline test.Supporting this effort was a multitude of documentation concerning safety,operations,and approvals to gain approvals from the relevant approvals bodies.The project demonstrated the feasibility of using hydrogen fuel cells as an autonomous fuel for railway propulsion systems,which has the potential for full decarbonisation. | Charles Calvert Jeff Allan Peter Amor Stuart Hillmansen Clive Roberts Paul Weston | 2021 | Railway Engineering Science2021，29，3： | 1 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员