|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Systematic review of colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk adults: Summarizing the current global recommendations显示文摘AIM To summarize and compare worldwide colorectal cancer(CRC) screening recommendations in order to identify similarities and disparities.METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CENTRAL and ISI Web of knowledge identifying all average-risk CRC screening guideline publications within the last ten years and/or position statements published in the last 2 years. In addition, a hand-search of the webpages of National Gastroenterology Society websites, the National Guideline Clearinghouse, the BMJ Clinical Evidence website,Google and Google Scholar was performed. RESULTS Fifteen guidelines were identified. Six guidelines were published in North America, four in Europe, four in Asia and one from the World Gastroenterology Organization. The majority of guidelines recommend screening average-risk individuals between ages 50 and 75 using colonoscopy(every 10 years), or flexible sigmoidoscopy(FS, every 5 years) or fecal occult blood test(FOBT, mainly the Fecal Immunochemical Test, annually or biennially). Disparities throughout the different guidelines are found relating to the use of colonoscopy, rank order between test, screening intervals and optimal age ranges for screening. CONCLUSION Average risk individuals between 50 and 75 years should undergo CRC screening. Recommendations for optimal surveillance intervals, preferred tests/test cascade as well as the optimal timing when to start and stop screening differ regionally and should be considered for clinical decision making. Furthermore, local resource availability and patient preferences are important to increase CRC screening uptake, as any screening is better than none. | Florence Bénard Alan N Barkun Myriam Martel Daniel von Renteln | 2018 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2018，24，1： | 16 |
| 2 | Comparing outcomes for endoscopic submucosal dissection between Eastern and Western countries:A systematic review and meta-analysis显示文摘AIM To compare endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) outcomes between Eastern and Western countries.METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using Pub Med,MEDLINE,Web of Science,CINAHL and EBM reviews to identify studies published between 1990 and February 2016. The primary outcome was the efficacy of ESD based on information about either curative resection,en bloc or R0 resection rates. Secondary outcomes were complication rates,local recurrence rates and procedure times. RESULTS Overall,238 publications including 84318 patients and 89512 gastrointestinal lesions resected using ESD were identified. 90% of the identified studies reporting ESDon 87296 lesions were conducted in Eastern countries and 10% of the identified studies reporting ESD outcomes in 2216 lesions were from Western countries. Meta-analyses showed higher pooled percentage of curative,en bloc,and R0 resection in the Eastern studies; 82%(CI: 81%-84%),95%(CI: 94%-96%) and 89%(CI: 88%-91%) compared to Western studies; 71%(CI: 61%-81%),85%(CI: 81%-89%) and 74%(CI: 67%-81%) respectively. The percentage of perforation requiring surgery was significantly greater in the Western countries(0.53%; CI: 0.10-1.16) compared to Eastern countries(0.01%; CI: 0%-0.05%). ESD procedure times were longer in Western countries(110 min vs 77 min).CONCLUSION Eastern countries show better ESD outcomes compared to Western countries. Availability of local ESD expertise and regional outcomes should be considered for decision making to treat gastrointestinal lesions with ESD. | Dane Christina Daoud Nicolas Suter Madeleine Durand Mickael Bouin Bernard Faulques Daniel von Renteln | 2018 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2018，24，23： | 8 |
| 3 | Endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric subepithelial tumors: a single-center series显示文摘 | Arthur Schmidt Markus Bauder Bettina Riecken Daniel von Renteln Helmut Muehleisen Karel Caca | 2014 | Endoscopy2014，，： | 3 |
| 4 | Recurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps:A systematic review and meta-analysis显示文摘BACKGROUND Complete polyp resection is the main goal of endoscopic removal of large colonic polyps.Resection techniques have evolved in recent years and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD),endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)with margin ablation,cold snare polypectomy(CSP),cold EMR,and underwater EMR have been introduced.Yet,efficacy of these techniques with regard to local recurrence rates(LRRs)vs traditional hot snare polypectomy and standard EMR remains unclear.AIM To analyze LRR of large colonic polyps in a systematic review and meta-analysis.METHODS MEDLINE,EMBASE,EBM Reviews,and CINAHL were searched for prospective studies reporting LRR or incomplete resection rate(IRR)after colonic polypectomy of polyps≥10 mm,published between January 2011 and July 2021.Primary outcome was LRR for polyps≥10 mm.RESULTS Six thousand nine hundred and twenty-eight publications were identified,of which 34 prospective studies were included.LRR for polyps≥10 mm at up to 12 mo’follow-up was 11.0%(95%CI,7.1%-14.8%;15 studies;4904 polyps).ESD(1.7%;95%CI,0%-3.4%;3 studies,221 polyps)and endoscopic mucosal resection with margin ablation(3.3%;95%CI,2.2%-4.5%;2 studies,947 polyps)significantly reduced LRR vs standard EMR without(15.2%;95%CI,12.5%-18.0%;4 studies,650 polyps)or with unsystematic margin ablation(16.5%;95%CI,15.2%-17.8%;6 studies,3031 polyps).CONCLUSION LRR is significantly lower after ESD or EMR with routine margin ablation;thus,these techniques should be considered standard for endoscopic removal of large colorectal polyps.Other techniques,such as CSP,cold EMR,and underwater EMR require further evaluation in prospective studies before their routine implementation in clinical practice can be recommended. | Carola Rotermund Roupen Djinbachian Mahsa Taghiakbari Markus D Enderle Axel Eickhoff Daniel von Renteln | 2022 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2022，28，29： | 3 |
| 5 | Feasibility and safety of EUS-guided cryothermal ablation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer显示文摘 | Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono Silvia Carrara Michele Reni Maria Chiara Petrone Stefano Cappio Gianpaolo Balzano Cinzia Boemo Stefano Cereda Roberto Nicoletti Markus Dominik Enderle Alexander Neugebauer Daniel von Renteln Axel Eickhoff Pier Alberto Testoni | 2012 | Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2012，，6： | 3 |
| 6 | Efficacy of Endoscopic Closure of Acute Perforations of the Gastrointestinal Tract显示文摘 | Rogier P. Voermans Olivier Le Moine Daniel von Renteln Thierry Ponchon Marc Giovannini Marco Bruno Bas Weusten Stefan Seewald Guido Costamagna Pierre Deprez Paul Fockens | 2012 | Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology2012，，6： | 2 |
| 7 | Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy:A review of current state of practice and research显示文摘Colonoscopy is an effective screening procedure in colorectal cancer prevention programs;however,colonoscopy practice can vary in terms of lesion detection,classification,and removal.Artificial intelligence(AI)-assisted decision support systems for endoscopy is an area of rapid research and development.The systems promise improved detection,classification,screening,and surveillance for colorectal polyps and cancer.Several recently developed applications for AIassisted colonoscopy have shown promising results for the detection and classification of colorectal polyps and adenomas.However,their value for real-time application in clinical practice has yet to be determined owing to limitations in the design,validation,and testing of AI models under real-life clinical conditions.Despite these current limitations,ambitious attempts to expand the technology further by developing more complex systems capable of assisting and supporting the endoscopist throughout the entire colonoscopy examination,including polypectomy procedures,are at the concept stage.However,further work is required to address the barriers and challenges of AI integration into broader colonoscopy practice,to navigate the approval process from regulatory organizations and societies,and to support physicians and patients on their journey to accepting the technology by providing strong evidence of its accuracy and safety.This article takes a closer look at the current state of AI integration into the field of colonoscopy and offers suggestions for future research. | Mahsa Taghiakbari Yuichi Mori Daniel von Renteln | 2021 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2021，27，47： | 2 |
| 8 | Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for the Treatment of Achalasia: An International Prospective Multicenter Study显示文摘 | Daniel Von Renteln Karl–Hermann Fuchs Paul Fockens Peter Bauerfeind Melina C. Vassiliou Yuki B. Werner Gerald Fried Wolfram Breithaupt Henriette Heinrich Albert J. Bredenoord Jan F. Kersten Tessa Verlaan Michael Trevisonno Thomas R?sch | 2013 | Gastroenterology2013，，2： | 2 |
| 9 | Modeling the effect of polish pad deformation on wafer surface stress distributions during chemical-mechanical polishing显示文摘 | Runnels S R Renteln P | 1993 | Dielect Sei Technol1993，6，： | 1 |
| 10 | Endoscopic GIST resection using FlushKnife ESD and subsequent perforation closure by means of endoscopic full-thickness suturing显示文摘 | D. von Renteln B. Riecken B. Walz H. Muehleisen K. Caca | 2008 | Endoscopy (S )2008，，02： | 1 |
| 11 | Peroral endoscopic myotomy or the treatment of achalasia: an international prospective muhicenter study 显示文摘 | Von Renteln D Fuchs KH Fockens P | 2013 | Gastroenterology2013，145，2： | 1 |
| 12 | Cultural Bias in International Law 显示文摘 | A D Renteln | 1998 | American Society of International Law Proceedings1998，，92： | 1 |
| 13 | Peroral endoscopicmyotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a prospective single centerstudy显示文摘 | von Renteln D Inoue H Minami H | 2012 | Am J astroenterol2012，107，3： | 1 |
| 14 | Endoscopic GIST resection using FlushKnife ESD and subsequent perforation closure by means of endoscopic full-thickness suturing显示文摘 | Von Renteln D Riecken B Walz B ct al | 2008 | Endoscopy2008，40，2： | 1 |
| 15 | Peroral endo- scopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a prospective single center study 显示文摘 | yon Renteln D Inoue H Minami H | 2012 | Am J Gastroenterol2012，107，3： | 1 |
| 16 | Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia:a prospective single center study显示文摘 | von Renteln D Inoue H Minami H | 2012 | Am J Gastroenterol2012，107，3： | 1 |
| 17 | Endoscopic full- thickness plication for the treatment of GERD by application of multiple Plicator implants: a muhicenter study (with video) 显示文摘 | yon Renteln D Schiefke I Fuchs KH | 2008 | Gastrointest Endosc2008，68，5： | 1 |
| 18 | Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of aehalasia: a prospective single center study显示文摘 | yon Renteln D Inoue H Minami H et ol | 2012 | The American jour- nal of gastroenterology2012，107，3： | 1 |
| 19 | Endoscopy GIST resection using Flush Knife ESD and subsequent perforation closure by means of endoscopic full-thickness suturing 显示文摘 | yon Renteln D Rieckcn B Walz B | 2008 | Endoscopy2008，40，2： | 1 |
| 20 | Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: an international prospective multicenter study 显示文摘 | Von Renteln D Fuchs KH Fockens P | 2013 | Gastroenterology2013，145，2： | 1 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员