|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018显示文摘The robotic surgical system has been applied in liver surgery. However,controversies concerns exist regarding a variety of factors including the safety,feasibility, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery. To promote the development of robotic hepatectomy, this study aimed to evaluate the current status of robotic hepatectomy and provide sixty experts' consensus and recommendations to promote its development. Based on the World Health Organization Handbook for Guideline Development, a Consensus Steering Group and a Consensus Development Group were established to determine the topics, prepare evidence-based documents, and generate recommendations. The GRADE Grid method and Delphi vote were used to formulate the recommendations. A total of 22 topics were prepared analyzed and widely discussed during the 4 meetings. Based on the published articles and expert panel opinion, 7 recommendations were generated by the GRADE method using an evidence-based method, which focused on the safety, feasibility, indication,techniques and cost-effectiveness of hepatectomy. Given that the current evidences were low to very low as evaluated by the GRADE method, further randomized-controlled trials are needed in the future to validate these recommendations. | Rong Liu Go Wakabayashi Hong-Jin Kim Gi-Hong Choi Anusak Yiengpruksawan Yuman Fong Jin He Ugo Boggi Roberto I Troisi Mikhail Efanov Daniel Azoulay Fabrizio Panaro Patrick Pessaux Xiao-Ying Wang Ji-Ye Zhu Shao-Geng Zhang Chuan-Dong Sun Zheng Wu Kai-Shan Tao Ke-Hu Yang Jia Fan Xiao-Ping Chen | 2019 | World Journal of Gastroenterology2019，25，12： | 23 |
| 2 | Microind- entation for in vivo measurement of bone tissue mechanical properti- es in humans显示文摘 | Adolfo Diez-Perez Roberto GO erri Xavier Nogues | 2010 | Journal of Bone and Mineral Research2010，25，8： | 1 |
| 3 | The capacitated plant location problem with multiple facilities in the same site显示文摘 | Gianpaolo G Francesca Go Roberto M | 2002 | Computers & Operations Research2002，，： | 1 |
| 4 | L - alanyl L - glutamine - supplemented parenteral nutrition improves infectious morbidity in sec- ondary peritonitis 显示文摘 | Clotilde FO Roberto AP Alejandro GO | 2004 | Clin Nutr2004，23，1： | 1 |
| 5 | L-Al-anyl - L - glutamine - supplemented parenteral nutrition improves infectious morbidity in secondary peritonitis显示文摘 | Clotilde FO Roberto AP Alejandro GO | 2004 | Clinical Nutrition2004，23，1： | 1 |
| 6 | Crystallizationof the y-form of isotactic polypropylene显示文摘 | Antonio Mari go Carla Marega Roberto Zannetti | 1989 | Makromol Chem1989，190，11： | 1 |
| 7 | Structural damage detection using the transformation matrix显示文摘 | Alberto Escobar J Jesu's Sosa J Roberto Go'mez | 2005 | Computers and Structures2005，83，45： | 1 |
| 8 | Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for huge (≥10 cm) liver tumors: an international multicenter propensity-score matched cohort study of 799 cases显示文摘Background:The use of laparoscopic(LLR)and robotic liver resections(RLR)has been safely performed in many institutions for liver tumours.A large scale international multicenter study would provide stronger evidence and insight into application of these techniques for huge liver tumours≥10 cm.Methods:This was a retrospective review of 971 patients who underwent LLR and RLR for huge(≥10 cm)tumors at 42 international centers between 2002-2020.Results:One hundred RLR and 699 LLR which met study criteria were included.The comparison between the 2 approaches for patients with huge tumors were performed using 1:3 propensity-score matching(PSM)(73 vs.219).Before PSM,LLR was associated with significantly increased frequency of previous abdominal surgery,malignant pathology,liver cirrhosis and increased median blood.After PSM,RLR and LLR was associated with no significant difference in key perioperative outcomes including media operation time(242 vs.290 min,P=0.286),transfusion rate rate(19.2%vs.16.9%,P=0.652),median blood loss(200 vs.300 mL,P=0.694),open conversion rate(8.2%vs.11.0%,P=0.519),morbidity(28.8%vs.21.9%,P=0.221),major morbidity(4.1%vs.9.6%,P=0.152),mortality and postoperative length of stay(6 vs.6 days,P=0.435).Conclusions:RLR and LLR can be performed safely for selected patients with huge liver tumours with excellent outcomes.There was no significant difference in perioperative outcomes after RLR or LLR. | Tan-To Cheung Rong Liu Federica Cipriani Xiaoying Wang Mikhail Efanov David Fuks Gi-Hong Choi Nicholas L.Syn Charing C.N.Chong Fabrizio Di Benedetto Ricardo Robles-Campos Vincenzo Mazzaferro Fernando Rotellar Santiago Lopez-Ben James O.Park Alejandro Mejia Iswanto Sucandy Adrian K.H.Chiow Marco V.Marino Mikel Gastaca Jae Hoon Lee TPeter Kingham Mathieu D’Hondt Sung Hoon Choi Robert P.Sutcliffe Ho-Seong Han Chung-Ngai Tang Johann Pratschke Roberto I.Troisi Go Wakabayashi Daniel Cherqui Felice Giuliante Davit L.Aghayan Bjorn Edwin Olivier Scatton Atsushi Sugioka Tran Cong Duy Long Constantino Fondevila Mohammad Abu Hilal Andrea Ruzzenente Alessandro Ferrero Paulo Herman Kuo-Hsin Chen Luca Aldrighetti Brian K.P.Goh International robotic and laparoscopic liver resection study group investigators | 2023 | Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition2023，12，2： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员